| Eastwood Home | |
|
Eastwood
Coalition Fire Bond Report There were about
20 representatives from the community present; neighbors, California
Donuts, Seven-Eleven, Yai Thai Restaurant and others. K.C. (President
of Eastwood Coalition) brought up the fact that the minutes of the
previous AOC meeting were inaccurate in stating that the city’s
announcement about the proposed location was well received by the
community. He asked that the
minutes be changed to show that the community is clearly in opposition.
The Chairman stated that the minutes would be corrected. Steven (neighbor)
asked that Alan Kawaguchi give an update about the status before further
public comments were made. Alan showed a map
of the proposed location and gave a brief history of FS 82’s land
acquisition process to date. He
mentioned that all the businesses and homes to be relocated had been
contacted with the exception of the 6 unit apartment building. Alan stated that there was a language barrier between the
City and the apartment building owner and that he was working on getting a
Thai interpreter. Steven (neighbor)
passed the committee copies of a letter from the Eastwood Coalition (and
surrounding community) that had been faxed to Council District Offices 4
and 13 the week before. The
letter was signed by 15 of the most affected neighbors.
He stated that the letter was an abbreviated version of what the
neighbors were about to say in public comment.
Steven then
showed that Alan Kawaguchi’s map did not show the Hollywood Freeway on
ramps that are less than 100 yards away from the proposed location, or the
names and locations of the businesses and homes at stake.
He stated that the existing Fire Station 82 on Bronson was a very
short distance away but caused the least amount of disruption to the
neighborhood because there is never any traffic issue there. He made it
clear that Hollywood Blvd. would be the fire truck egress and that the
side streets were for ingress only. He pointed out that the traffic on
Hollywood Blvd. is often bumper to bumper and spoke to the fact that there
would be heightened noise to the neighborhood while the fire trucks worked
for long periods of time to get out onto Hollywood Blvd through this
gridlock. What about
Florentine Gardens? Sahni
(franchise holder of Seven-Eleven) told this committee that 7-11
has been on that spot for 30 years and that running a 7-11 is all he knows
how to do. He has held the franchise for 10 years. It is the only 7-11 on
Hollywood Blvd and is responsible for over $200,000 in sales revenue for
the city of Los Angeles. He is concerned for his family and putting his
kids through school if he has to close down. The city cannot afford to
give him the $700,000 which is what it would take to transfer/relocate and
even then, a replacement store would more than likely be a great distance
from his home. Rivers (neighbor)
criticized the city for choosing a site that would destroy vintage
architecture (The Good Shepherd Shelter) when a long strip of open land
existed so close by (the Florentine Gardens location).
He said that The City must come up with additional money if needed. Harry (neighbor)
gave some specific history on the Craftsman House the Good Shepherd
Shelter is in. He is working
closely with Hollywood Heritage to get more information regarding this
1916 Craftsman home. He also commented on the good level of neighborhood
communication in general and said how wrong the site choice is
(destruction of good neighborhood components) when Florentine Gardens made
so much more sense. Pastor Greg
Hoenes (7th Day Adventist church) reinforced the good
relationship the church and community has with the LAFD.
He added that the Florentine Gardens location is more appropriate
in that there also happens to be a courthouse and a Salvation Army Youth
Center there. Logical city
planning would position the firehouse at that location as well. Martha (neighbor)
told the committee that this group is not against fire stations or the
committee but that the group wants what is best for the community.
She also mentioned that as long as she has lived in the
neighborhood, Florentine Gardens has not been good neighbors and she
prefers that site for the fire station.
She also said that 7-11 and the restaurants are excellent neighbors
and that those businesses are like family. She said that unlike most 7-11
stores, this one actually makes the neighborhood safer. Dave ( Eastwood
Coalition rep.) made
additional points about the congestion on Hollywood Blvd at the proposed
location and made it clear that the Florentine Gardens location never has
any traffic congestion. Astrud (neighbor)
commented on the fact that the proposed upheaval, destruction and
compromise would bring only
one more ambulance to the community.
She also said that with our population growing so will the eventual
need for additional space for the Fire Station which will necessitate more
land grabs and the loss of more old homes on Taft and Van Ness.
She also pointed out that her husband’s business (Mel Pierce
Camera) would suffer if traffic was pushed back further east on Hollywood
Blvd to keep the Fire Station Ramp clear.
(Her husband’s camera shop is one block east of Taft Ave. She
read his statement which pointed out that currently it is hard to get
customers to come to his shop because they have little parking and it’s
difficult to pull away from the curb at most times during the day with
Hollywood gridlock the way it is.) K.C. (Eastwood
Coalition) said that Florentine Gardens is a better, more logical choice
for the fire station because of its size and location.
He also mentioned that “The City-mandated Community Noise
Exposure Level test” or CNEL test that was done at the previous proposed
location was bordering the
legal limit. The new location
(next to the freeway) would put the CNEL past the legal limit. Alan Kawaguchi
dismissed this suggestion as the Saab repair shop is part of the parcel of
land that also has the existing pool hall as well as a large apartment
building now under construction. The
City had abandoned that prospect months ago. Huok Cheng (The
owner of California Donuts) said
that he has 2 children and has been there for 15 years - he expressed his
desire to keep his business. Jose (owner of
Natalie Peruvian Restaurant) was present but chose not to speak. |
|